| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
admin
Site Admin
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 1286
|
 Posted: Jun 08, 2010 8:05 am Post subject: JFYI: Successfully installed on QNAP TS-509 Pro Turbo NAS |
 |
|
| Glad to inform everyone that we successfuly installed Xfilesharing Pro script on QNAP TS-509 Pro Turbo NAS (http://www.qnap.com/pro_detail_feature.asp?p_id=104). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ankurs
Joined: 10 Mar 2009
Posts: 605
|
| Posted: Jun 08, 2010 9:58 am Post subject: Re: JFYI: Successfully installed on QNAP TS-509 Pro Turbo NA |
|
|
does this mean, this NAS can be used as a fileserver ? or it can be used as NAS to our file servers ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
admin
Site Admin
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 1286
|
| Posted: Jun 08, 2010 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
It can work as file server and as main server. The guy who own it - using it as main + file server (not the best decision, but will see).
But it will be pretty good as file server. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ankurs
Joined: 10 Mar 2009
Posts: 605
|
| Posted: Jun 08, 2010 10:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| admin wrote: |
But it will be pretty good as file server. |
is ngnix setup for file server possible on this ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
admin
Site Admin
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 1286
|
| Posted: Jun 08, 2010 10:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| In theory - yes. But that will be quite complicated task, since it comes without almost any software (make, gcc, etc, etc). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ankurs
Joined: 10 Mar 2009
Posts: 605
|
| Posted: Jun 08, 2010 10:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| admin wrote: | | In theory - yes. But that will be quite complicated task, since it comes without almost any software (make, gcc, etc, etc). |
oh ok
hows the performance of file server ?
just saw the hardware specifications, its using celeron and just 1gb ram; will be real hard to push significant traffic with that kinda machine, isnt it |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
admin
Site Admin
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 1286
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ankurs
Joined: 10 Mar 2009
Posts: 605
|
| Posted: Jun 08, 2010 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
yah higher end models have better cpu, but they suck at ram ; max i see is 2gb ram and that wont be sufficient whn serving 100 users at a time
i guess building a server is better, if the FS is going to be busy; or else this NAS is good to start with  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
admin
Site Admin
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 1286
|
| Posted: Jun 08, 2010 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Well, the user I'm talking about having this device at home Good for local network |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dotceo
Joined: 30 Dec 2009
Posts: 70
|
| Posted: Jun 08, 2010 2:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NAS will be too slow for a bigger size site... We were experimenting with iSCSI just last month...
Now we're experimenting with other solutions, so hopefully they work out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Register
Search
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
