| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
dotceo
Joined: 30 Dec 2009
Posts: 70
|
 Posted: May 08, 2010 2:11 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
If it were based on space, then any new server (having the least amount of space used) would be under heavy load when initially attached.
From what I have experience with the software is that it goes in order from the last server attached to the oldest if available with the space required. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ankurs
Joined: 10 Mar 2009
Posts: 605
|
| Posted: May 09, 2010 9:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| dotceo wrote: | | If it were based on space, then any new server (having the least amount of space used) would be under heavy load when initially attached. |
thats basically what happens
thats why i requested sibsoft for a SAN/Storage server option, where we can add as many front end servers we want depending on kind of traffic we get |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dotceo
Joined: 30 Dec 2009
Posts: 70
|
| Posted: May 09, 2010 1:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I guess I really didn't pay attention then... We don't use the method of adding additional "file servers". Due to a catastrophic event, we had to re-engineer our whole setup. It's been working for us so far, so it was worth the amount of time we put in to it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ankurs
Joined: 10 Mar 2009
Posts: 605
|
| Posted: May 09, 2010 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Can you tell what kinda setup your using ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Register
Search
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
