Hello,
I'm try to migrate my old servers to bigger new servers.
I'm using software Raid5 with 12x4TB disk.
I will use 1 partition on this big raid array 40TB~
I'm using CentOS 7. I have 2 chose now, EXT4 or XFS
Some benchmark tell XFS is faster than EXT4 for big partition with to many files on reading IO. But its have some bed reports about to many delete files procedure.
So, do you have any experience about XFS?
NOTE: I have already EXT4 servers but XFS is a bit new FileSystem for me.
If you can speed test from your home connection for this file and share it to me with your message, it will be great. Thank you
My new data center test file:
http://mirror.dgn.net.tr/centos/7.0.140 ... s/boot.iso
.
XFileSharing Pro - EXPERT Question: XFS or EXT4 is better for XFileSharing?
yes, use raid6 or raid60ufkabakan wrote:Raid 5 disaster, Why? Failed 2 disks on same time?ankurs wrote:raid5 = disaster waiting to happen, also gives poor performance
EXT4 should be the fastest for most workloads.
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/storage/why-r ... n-2009/162
-
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Aug 20, 2010 4:39 am
How about SnapRAID ?ankurs wrote:we use s/w raid10, as its customizable/free/stablespeakerbox wrote: Ankurs, do you recommend using a raid card or software?
but if your using raid6 & have the extra budget, go with raid card
http://snapraid.sourceforge.net/compare.html
Its look like PAR system on Usenet
never used itufkabakan wrote: How about SnapRAID ?
http://snapraid.sourceforge.net/compare.html
Its look like PAR system on Usenet
- PilgrimX182
- Posts: 2186
- Joined: Mar 22, 2006 1:39 pm