XFileSharing Pro - XFilesharing Pro 2.2 is out - Page 2

Message
Author
speakerbox
Posts: 73
Joined: Aug 20, 2010 4:39 am

#16 Postby speakerbox » Mar 18, 2014 11:31 pm

I am still getting this error when viewing mp4 files on the demo site.

Undefined subroutine &index_dl::encodeJS called at index_dl.pm line 531.

Also, I don't see any option to select between the jwplayer and the flowplayer. Am I missing something?

Thanks

Manders
Posts: 19
Joined: Mar 27, 2014 10:04 pm

XFilesharing Pro 2.2 is out

#17 Postby Manders » Mar 27, 2014 10:10 pm

Is it possible to post a document showing exactly which scripts (And possibly a list of changes within the scripts) have changed so that we can manually upgrade our sites without destroying any custom code/custom templates that we may have implemented?

ankurs
Posts: 1054
Joined: Mar 10, 2009 2:34 am

Re: XFilesharing Pro 2.2 is out

#18 Postby ankurs » Mar 28, 2014 6:43 am

Manders wrote:Is it possible to post a document showing exactly which scripts (And possibly a list of changes within the scripts) have changed so that we can manually upgrade our sites without destroying any custom code/custom templates that we may have implemented?
download 2.2 and compare with 2.1 files and you will know the difference

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1839
Joined: Mar 22, 2006 12:32 pm

#19 Postby admin » Mar 28, 2014 9:13 am

speakerbox wrote:Also, I don't see any option to select between the jwplayer and the flowplayer. Am I missing something?
Thanks
Make sure that you updated template. It's in "Video mod" settings (you can see it on demo site).

Manders
Posts: 19
Joined: Mar 27, 2014 10:04 pm

#20 Postby Manders » Mar 28, 2014 9:40 pm

mmmmmm, well Admin, thanks for answering speakerbox's question and ignoring mine!

Meanwhile, I am running the scripts against CompareIt! 4.2 and WOW what a lot of work it is without knowing at least what scripts to look in - PLEASE let us know the scripts that have changed so that we can retrofit our code.

Also, perhaps for future enhancements it would help all of us (Your customers) if you could prefix each of the new variables (And even comment changes with the version number:

EG. Instead of m_y_ppd_rebills perhaps consider 2.2_m_y_ppd_rebills (And comment as appropriate).

That would make searching for changes so much easier using any sort of standard HTML editor that has global search capabilities!

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1839
Joined: Mar 22, 2006 12:32 pm

#21 Postby admin » Mar 31, 2014 11:16 am

Manders, ankrus is right - you can use "diff" to see the difference between script you're using and the latest version you can download from your client area. That's the most reliable way of merging 2 script version.

Variable naming depends on script version is quite strange approach and will never happen, sorry.

Manders
Posts: 19
Joined: Mar 27, 2014 10:04 pm

#22 Postby Manders » Mar 31, 2014 2:47 pm

I agree that using software to find the DIFF is the correct approach - But with so many scripts to compare is it possible to know WHICH of the scripts changed so that the DIFF is only applied to specific scripts - Otherwise there are A LOT of scripts to compare if you want to compare them all!

However, I just checked the CompareIT software and it actually has a way to compare each file/script within a folder!

Hopefully this will help others trying to merge the source without destroying their templates and/or custom code.

Many thanks for your help guys.

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1839
Joined: Mar 22, 2006 12:32 pm

#23 Postby admin » Mar 31, 2014 3:27 pm

There are changes in almost all .cgi and .pm files. So, yes - you have to find a way to do a bulk diff.

Google
Posts: 9
Joined: Sep 02, 2013 10:55 pm

#24 Postby Google » Apr 04, 2014 10:33 am

Bug,

Please fix the check box on http://xfilesharing.com/?op=my_files,

First click at the select all on check box can select but second click can't select all file.

Thanks.

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1839
Joined: Mar 22, 2006 12:32 pm

#25 Postby admin » Apr 04, 2014 10:55 am

Thanks, fixed.

jaro
Posts: 40
Joined: Oct 24, 2011 7:38 pm

#26 Postby jaro » Apr 04, 2014 9:11 pm

in which file was the bug?
@Admin:
Why you don't change the version number, when you bug fix something.

Like
2.2.1

Simple and all now there is a bug fix -.-

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1839
Joined: Mar 22, 2006 12:32 pm

#27 Postby admin » Apr 09, 2014 10:40 am

Microsoft Azure support were added to CDN mod.