15 posts • Page 1 of 1
mubin wrote:Does anyone know about the backend? I am not worried about the design but more so about how the site works.
It seems like it is just a video site, or is it also an upload site?
this means you can upload everything... perhaps he wanted to safe money in just buying the xfs code instead of xvideo...
if it would be a video site if it was mine I would just allow videos like mp4 or avi and not everything...
the site looks nice at the first sight but the layout needs a lot of tuning in my eyes...
admin wrote:upmaster wrote:admin wrote:It's XFilesharing Pro.
Hmm is it fair to publish who is your customer ?
That's not a secret and can be easily checked by everyone who know typical Xfilesharing URLs.
I think upmaster is right. even if you can see the urls it should be up to the customer to decide if he wants to share his site or not in this forum
randy wrote:I think upmaster is right. even if you can see the urls it should be up to the customer to decide if he wants to share his site or not in this forum
are you dumb ? admin didnt reveal, there was a question raised if it was a xfs pro or not & he just clarified it
http://www.vidhog.com/?op=registration , is enough for anybody who has used xfs to know that its using xfs