XFileSharing Pro - Server LoadBalancing Would Be Perfict 1- Page 2

Powerfull XFileSharing version

Moderator: admin

Message
Author
dotceo
Posts: 70
Joined: Dec 30, 2009 9:34 pm

#16 Postby dotceo » May 08, 2010 2:11 pm

If it were based on space, then any new server (having the least amount of space used) would be under heavy load when initially attached.

From what I have experience with the software is that it goes in order from the last server attached to the oldest if available with the space required.

ankurs
Posts: 1054
Joined: Mar 10, 2009 2:34 am

#17 Postby ankurs » May 09, 2010 9:30 am

dotceo wrote:If it were based on space, then any new server (having the least amount of space used) would be under heavy load when initially attached.

thats basically what happens

thats why i requested sibsoft for a SAN/Storage server option, where we can add as many front end servers we want depending on kind of traffic we get

dotceo
Posts: 70
Joined: Dec 30, 2009 9:34 pm

#18 Postby dotceo » May 09, 2010 1:54 pm

I guess I really didn't pay attention then... We don't use the method of adding additional "file servers". Due to a catastrophic event, we had to re-engineer our whole setup. It's been working for us so far, so it was worth the amount of time we put in to it.

ankurs
Posts: 1054
Joined: Mar 10, 2009 2:34 am

#19 Postby ankurs » May 09, 2010 2:14 pm

Can you tell what kinda setup your using ?


Return to “XFileSharing Pro”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests