XFileSharing Pro - XFileSharing Pro on Cloud Server
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Oct 09, 2007 10:49 pm
XFileSharing Pro on Cloud Server
Is it possible to integrate XFileSharing Pro with a cloud server such as Amazon S3 or RackSpace?
- PilgrimX182
- Posts: 2186
- Joined: Mar 22, 2006 1:39 pm
-
- Posts: 521
- Joined: Dec 19, 2009 5:12 pm
well , i cant deny what they say
a dedi is a cheaper solution , specialy when you can go unmetered (is not always needed , not to start with)
a cloud server is not a good solutoin , its a system they use so you got multiple dedi's instead 1 dedicated
so if you need a lot of servers and if you are becoming like rapidshare is that maybe a solution
but it is expensive because they need to earn some money to off it
and like you know , you know how they make money ^^
so a dedi is a better and cheaper solution , only 1 downside on it , you need to take care of everything , settings , installs and so on
on a claud server is that not needed, thats pre configured
but to give a good example over vps servers
i can get a own dedi for .. $ 224,99 USD Monthly ?? ( QuadCore Q9300 8GB ram and 1TB hd and no traffic limit on a shared 100mb/s port )
http://boosterking.com is located on the same spects ( the download files then)
if i want it for a vps , so 8GB ram
then it cost me 400 $
then i got only 4TB traffic and 500GB hd
so if you calculate the difference , then i shal choose a dedi to
then a second reason and problem with claud servers
mostly they are shared resources like a vps
they are build up from a main server and then you get a part from it , so it can switch to a other part in case 1 part fails or when you want to upgrade
problem ?? well , speed is slow and cpu is not dedicated anymore (shared by more then 1 user)
if you are intrested (yea , bit promoting and taking the change )
i can offer you a dedi to ^^ ( http://getadedi.com )
Thank you
Greets From PowerChaos
a dedi is a cheaper solution , specialy when you can go unmetered (is not always needed , not to start with)
a cloud server is not a good solutoin , its a system they use so you got multiple dedi's instead 1 dedicated
so if you need a lot of servers and if you are becoming like rapidshare is that maybe a solution
but it is expensive because they need to earn some money to off it
and like you know , you know how they make money ^^
so a dedi is a better and cheaper solution , only 1 downside on it , you need to take care of everything , settings , installs and so on
on a claud server is that not needed, thats pre configured
but to give a good example over vps servers
i can get a own dedi for .. $ 224,99 USD Monthly ?? ( QuadCore Q9300 8GB ram and 1TB hd and no traffic limit on a shared 100mb/s port )
http://boosterking.com is located on the same spects ( the download files then)
if i want it for a vps , so 8GB ram
then it cost me 400 $
then i got only 4TB traffic and 500GB hd
so if you calculate the difference , then i shal choose a dedi to
then a second reason and problem with claud servers
mostly they are shared resources like a vps
they are build up from a main server and then you get a part from it , so it can switch to a other part in case 1 part fails or when you want to upgrade
problem ?? well , speed is slow and cpu is not dedicated anymore (shared by more then 1 user)
if you are intrested (yea , bit promoting and taking the change )
i can offer you a dedi to ^^ ( http://getadedi.com )
Thank you
Greets From PowerChaos