XFileMirror - Feature requests

File mirroring solution

Moderator: admin

Message
Author
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1800
Joined: Mar 22, 2006 12:32 pm

Feature requests

#1 Postby admin » Aug 18, 2011 2:02 pm

Post your feature requests here. Be as much specific as possible and do not request new file sharing sites here - we will have separate topic for that.
Last edited by admin on Jan 28, 2014 11:11 am, edited 1 time in total.

chrda
Posts: 296
Joined: Sep 14, 2009 7:16 pm
Contact:

#2 Postby chrda » Aug 25, 2011 10:36 am

You should have a support for your own XFS script on this platform :)

kjbweb
Posts: 10
Joined: Sep 06, 2011 4:24 pm
Location: Preston, UK

#3 Postby kjbweb » Sep 07, 2011 8:22 am

It'd be great to allow a registered to user to set their preferred filehost to download from, so when they visit a download link it'd forward them on automatically to that host providing the file has been successfully uploaded to it; if not, it'd fail gracefully back to the list of mirrors.

The forwarded page should still include the iFrame'd advertisements spot, though I feel it shouldn't be subjected to the time-limit; that's my personal preference however.

This would deter popular file-sharing forums from banning posts linking to file-mirroring sites as they don't like the fact we can fill our sites with ad's, making it mine field to navigate before the user actually obtains the download.

Keep up the good work Sibsoft!

kjbweb
Posts: 10
Joined: Sep 06, 2011 4:24 pm
Location: Preston, UK

#4 Postby kjbweb » Sep 07, 2011 8:23 am

chrda wrote:You should have a support for your own XFS script on this platform :)


I second this!

Though I realise this would need to be a pay'd for addition, of which I'd be happy to pay for.

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1800
Joined: Mar 22, 2006 12:32 pm

#5 Postby admin » Sep 07, 2011 8:24 am

kjbweb wrote:It'd be great to allow a registered to user to set their preferred filehost to download from, so when they visit a download link it'd forward them on automatically to that host providing the file has been successfully uploaded to it; if not, it'd fail gracefully back to the list of mirrors.

The forwarded page should still include the iFrame'd advertisements spot, though I feel it shouldn't be subjected to the time-limit; that's my personal preference however.

This would deter popular file-sharing forums from banning posts linking to file-mirroring sites as they don't like the fact we can fill our sites with ad's, making it mine field to navigate before the user actually obtains the download.

Keep up the good work Sibsoft!


Thanks for suggestions

As for time countdown on page with iframe - it can be disabled by setting 0 in admin settings.

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1800
Joined: Mar 22, 2006 12:32 pm

#6 Postby admin » Sep 07, 2011 8:26 am

kjbweb wrote:
chrda wrote:You should have a support for your own XFS script on this platform :)


I second this!

Though I realise this would need to be a pay'd for addition, of which I'd be happy to pay for.


That's technically possible, but there's some ethical problems :) Not all xfilesharing site owners will want to allow leeching/automatic mirroring on their sites.

kjbweb
Posts: 10
Joined: Sep 06, 2011 4:24 pm
Location: Preston, UK

#7 Postby kjbweb » Sep 07, 2011 8:30 am

admin wrote:That's technically possible, but there's some ethical problems :) Not all xfilesharing site owners will want to allow leeching/automatic mirroring on their sites.


A very good point, I wasn't actually thinking that however; I got confused it seems with what chrda was suggesting.

I was thinking, having instead of the standard progress bar upload to use Xupload instead; it seems a much cooler progress tracking solution.

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1800
Joined: Mar 22, 2006 12:32 pm

#8 Postby admin » Sep 07, 2011 8:32 am

kjbweb wrote:I was thinking, having instead of the standard progress bar upload to use Xupload instead; it seems a much cooler progress tracking solution.


Such progress bar will cause higher load on your server.

kjbweb
Posts: 10
Joined: Sep 06, 2011 4:24 pm
Location: Preston, UK

#9 Postby kjbweb » Sep 07, 2011 8:34 am

admin wrote:
kjbweb wrote:I was thinking, having instead of the standard progress bar upload to use Xupload instead; it seems a much cooler progress tracking solution.


Such progress bar will cause higher load on your server.


Fair enough, I didn't know whether you'd left out the more advanced uploader because it'd perhaps clash with your other products or whether there was a technical reason; now I know :)

Many thanks!

kjbweb
Posts: 10
Joined: Sep 06, 2011 4:24 pm
Location: Preston, UK

#10 Postby kjbweb » Sep 09, 2011 3:55 pm

Any chance when we delete a file, instead of it simply then reporting a 404/Not Found, can it say it's been removed by request of the IP owner?

Cheers.

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1800
Joined: Mar 22, 2006 12:32 pm

#11 Postby admin » Sep 10, 2011 6:15 am

kjbweb wrote:Any chance when we delete a file, instead of it simply then reporting a 404/Not Found, can it say it's been removed by request of the IP owner?

Cheers.


Good point. Will add.

nik0la
Posts: 102
Joined: Dec 30, 2009 1:50 pm

#12 Postby nik0la » Sep 12, 2011 4:42 pm

"Check status" of links on filesharing sites, if they are dead or aviliable will be a great feature

neomon
Posts: 22
Joined: Sep 21, 2011 7:43 pm

#13 Postby neomon » Oct 03, 2011 4:29 pm

a feature to protect the remote links, so the real download link is hidden

like this sites
- http://linksave.in
- http://linkcrypt.ws

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1800
Joined: Mar 22, 2006 12:32 pm

#14 Postby admin » Oct 05, 2011 6:17 am

nik0la wrote:"Check status" of links on filesharing sites, if they are dead or aviliable will be a great feature


Yeah, that will be added. It will work automatically.

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1800
Joined: Mar 22, 2006 12:32 pm

#15 Postby admin » Oct 05, 2011 6:19 am

neomon wrote:a feature to protect the remote links, so the real download link is hidden

like this sites
- http://linksave.in
- http://linkcrypt.ws


What do you mean by protect?
You think that links like http://xfilemirror.com/ob7pn5fym0l8 are not enough protected?


Return to “XFileMirror”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests