XFileSharing Pro - JFYI: Successfully installed on QNAP TS-509 Pro Turbo NAS

Message
Author
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1808
Joined: Mar 22, 2006 12:32 pm

JFYI: Successfully installed on QNAP TS-509 Pro Turbo NAS

#1 Postby admin » Jun 08, 2010 8:05 am

Glad to inform everyone that we successfuly installed Xfilesharing Pro script on QNAP TS-509 Pro Turbo NAS (http://www.qnap.com/pro_detail_feature.asp?p_id=104).

ankurs
Posts: 1054
Joined: Mar 10, 2009 2:34 am

Re: JFYI: Successfully installed on QNAP TS-509 Pro Turbo NA

#2 Postby ankurs » Jun 08, 2010 9:58 am

admin wrote:Glad to inform everyone that we successfuly installed Xfilesharing Pro script on QNAP TS-509 Pro Turbo NAS (http://www.qnap.com/pro_detail_feature.asp?p_id=104).

does this mean, this NAS can be used as a fileserver ? or it can be used as NAS to our file servers ?

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1808
Joined: Mar 22, 2006 12:32 pm

#3 Postby admin » Jun 08, 2010 10:01 am

It can work as file server and as main server. The guy who own it - using it as main + file server (not the best decision, but will see).

But it will be pretty good as file server.

ankurs
Posts: 1054
Joined: Mar 10, 2009 2:34 am

#4 Postby ankurs » Jun 08, 2010 10:04 am

admin wrote:But it will be pretty good as file server.

is ngnix setup for file server possible on this ?

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1808
Joined: Mar 22, 2006 12:32 pm

#5 Postby admin » Jun 08, 2010 10:07 am

In theory - yes. But that will be quite complicated task, since it comes without almost any software (make, gcc, etc, etc).

ankurs
Posts: 1054
Joined: Mar 10, 2009 2:34 am

#6 Postby ankurs » Jun 08, 2010 10:15 am

admin wrote:In theory - yes. But that will be quite complicated task, since it comes without almost any software (make, gcc, etc, etc).

oh ok

hows the performance of file server ?

just saw the hardware specifications, its using celeron and just 1gb ram; will be real hard to push significant traffic with that kinda machine, isnt it

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1808
Joined: Mar 22, 2006 12:32 pm

#7 Postby admin » Jun 08, 2010 10:37 am

Well,

they have products on Core 2 Duo

http://www.qnap.com/pro_detail_hardware.asp?p_id=109

ankurs
Posts: 1054
Joined: Mar 10, 2009 2:34 am

#8 Postby ankurs » Jun 08, 2010 10:53 am

admin wrote:Well,

they have products on Core 2 Duo

http://www.qnap.com/pro_detail_hardware.asp?p_id=109

yah higher end models have better cpu, but they suck at ram ; max i see is 2gb ram and that wont be sufficient whn serving 100 users at a time

i guess building a server is better, if the FS is going to be busy; or else this NAS is good to start with :)

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1808
Joined: Mar 22, 2006 12:32 pm

#9 Postby admin » Jun 08, 2010 10:55 am

Well, the user I'm talking about having this device at home :) Good for local network :)

dotceo
Posts: 70
Joined: Dec 30, 2009 9:34 pm

#10 Postby dotceo » Jun 08, 2010 2:21 pm

NAS will be too slow for a bigger size site... We were experimenting with iSCSI just last month...

Now we're experimenting with other solutions, so hopefully they work out.


Return to “XFileSharing Pro”



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests